Sponsored by
- Film/TV
tinas baby hollyoaks(could be spoilers)
7/7/08 22:03
5/7/08 23:16
the baby is massive! no way would a 30weeker be that big!
5/7/08 17:58
She is only 30 weeks cause she was supposedly due a week after me lol it's pathetic he's gone home already, that could never happen surely?!
4/7/08 19:03
omfg n now im watchin e4 n the baby is only a few days old n in normal hospital cos in tinas room grrrrrr
4/7/08 18:57
no she went for 12 wk scan n they said ur 15 wks!!!i think it would be better if we just didnt see the baby cos it iirritates wen ive had a baby bout as prem that n he looked nothin like that or they should use a life like doll
4/7/08 11:28
I agree, the baby certainly didn't look like a new born let along a prem baby, to me it looked a couple of months old by the movements it was making. I know its only a programme but they could have used a baby that was slightly smaller or filmed it while it was asleep.
4/7/08 10:27
Still though, that baby barely even looked new born. I swear it was like 18 months old. Ok, perhaps not that old, but it was BIG!
4/7/08 09:52
IT is a programme, i doubt any parent with a early baby would let it go on hollyoaks!
4/7/08 09:45
When she went for her 12 week scan did the sonographer not say that the baby was 18 weeks gestation?? Therefore is 36 weeks..
4/7/08 08:47
that baby was the size of a full term 40 week baby
3/7/08 13:18
I know babies are all different but I would have thought the baby would have been smaller.
3/7/08 08:37
i guess every babys different.
i cant see any hospital let alone parents use a premature baby for filming. its another one of these things that we are not supposed to notice lol
3/7/08 08:33
my friends babies were born at 31 and 32weeks and although tiny (like 2-3lbs) they didnt need ANY help with anything no breathing or feeding help they both did it on thier own (although my 35weeks needed help with both!)
i guess not many people with a prem baby would want them being used in hollyoaks e.t.c so they have to use a smaller but normal gestation baby maybe?
2/7/08 20:39
yea i no that but doc said 30 wks n tony said no shes not that far!!
2/7/08 20:36
PP is right, it's actually Russ' baby, therefore a few weeks gestation ahead of what everyine else thinks.
2/7/08 19:24
I thought that too btu maybe its related ot the fact that she was originally further on than she thought and its is Russ's from the 1 nigth stand - dunno though.
2/7/08 19:14
im watchin tomorrows now n im sure they said baby was born at 30 wks its in an incubator looks massive is wide awake n has no feedin tube.now my ds was born at just over 31wks n was tiny eyes closed all time had cpap for few hrs and had feeding tube>did i miss hear somethin or has anyone else noticed this
Advertisment
Latest news
Weekly poll
The information on Bounty.com is not a substitute for examination, diagnosis or treatment by a qualified health professional.
- Privacy statement/Terms and conditions
- Disclaimer
- Contact us
- Accessibility statement
- FAQ
- Sitemap
- News Feeds |
Copyright © 2001-2008 Bounty (UK) Ltd. All rights reserved.
In an episode weeks back.....
When tina went for the scan she found out she had got her dates wrong. She told jackie that "it could'nt be tony's baby" and that infact it would be russ' baby. Tina had wanted to tell tony the truth but jackie begged her not to.
Thats why when the doctor said about the baby being full term (can't remember exactly what he said) jackie tried to sweep past it and told tony the doctor did'n know what he was saying.
Hope that helps.